The science described in this document is very old, in the 1800’s water was turned into hydrogen and oxygen, using a battery. In 1805 the first car with an internal combustion engine burned hydrogen from water. Jules Verne wrote in 1875 that WATER would be the fuel of the future. Reference

As we are all aware, engines that run on gasoline won out over Electric, Hydrogen and Steam Technologies and in 1888 the first production automobiles were made by Karl Benz in Germany.

But through the centuries interest has remained in hydrogen and Electric Technologies because of its sustainability.

In the 1820 British scientist introduced the concept of renewable hydrogen in his paper, Science and the Future, by proposing that ”there will be great power stations where during windy weather the surplus power will be used for the electrolytic decomposition of water into oxygen and hydrogen.” Today Iceland is become energy independent by moving to a Hydrogen economy using their thermal energy to do exactly this. See Video

In fact as far back as 1918; Charles H. Frazer received the first patent for a “hydro-booster”. Charles’s research found that his hydro booster design worked the best with low grade fuels  Reference.

Add to this, CH Garrett’s (and his Dad’s) 1935 electrolytic carburetor technology. It has been known for some time (since a 1974 paper by the Jet Propulsion Lab of the California Institute of Technology) that the addition of hydrogen to fossil fuels, burned in internal combustion engines, will increase the efficiency of that engine.

This study has been validated by a number of papers published by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) .The hydroxy boost process is effective with any fossil fuel (diesel, gasoline, propane, natural gas) or bio-fuel (biodiesel, ethanol) though it is most effective in diesel engines.

Among other, more subtle effects, the presence of the hydrogen alters the initial stages of the unfolding combustion dynamic, altering the kinetic chemical pathway which the combustion follows. The net effect is to alter the time at which heat energy is released relative to the power cycle. The end result is to increase the adiabatic efficiency of the engine, which, in turn, means decreased fuel consumption, decreased emissions, improved horsepower and torque and decreased maintenance expenses.

There have since surfaced MANY scientific tests, patents and designs which prove this technologies worth and benefits. Yet car makers are not making hydroxy boosters in a standard model to save fuel and prevent unneeded harmful emissions- Reference. Why have hydroxy boosters since been ignored? Why are they suppressed? Using Occam Razor’s logic, the simplistic answer is following the money. The answers are contained in what hydroxy boosters can do NOW, and in what their advanced designs WILL lead to.

Hydroxy system uses only water and electricity to produce the Hydrogen and Oxygen gases from water, testing shows greatly reduced or totally eliminated emissions, removal of engine and exhaust carbon deposits, improved torque and power, and increased fuel economy due to the complete burning of the vehicles existing fuel. The hydroxy booster extracts separated Hydrogen and Oxygen gases from distilled water in a stainless steel container installed in a vehicle.

The unit uses a little of the vehicles excess energy to produce just the right amount of Hydrogen catalyst to blend with the existing fuel source, enhancing the combustion of fuel from 30% up to 90% or more, completely incinerating fuel toxins and particulates due to the high 3000 degree burn temperature of the Hydrogen catalyst, creating clean air exhaust discharge. The gases go into the vehicle air intake system separately from each other. Vehicles can use regular fuel.

Not only does this technology Improve MPG (miles per gallon), SIGNIFICANTLY CUT EMMISSIONS down to a healthier level plus allow many more benefits. This technology also opens the door scientifically for 100% water based oxyhydrogen fuel systems for vehicles. This is an obvious threat to the multi trillion dollar OIL industry. Hydroxy technology has even shown to be effective at reduction of radioactivity.

Hydroxy technologies also show that hydrogen power can be stored safely by being perfectly inert in water. As a result, hydrogen can be produced on DEMAND from water. This eliminates the need for dangerous hydrogen storage tanks on board cars and in any communities wishing to use hydrogen for power.

Quote - ” Hydrogen-on-demand does not need costly infrastructure and makes cars safer “  Hydrogen-on-demand would not only remove the need for costly hydrogen pipelines and distribution infrastructure, it would also make hydrogen vehicles safer. “The theoretical advantage of on-board generation is that you don’t have to muck about with hydrogen storage,” says Mike Millikin, who monitors developments in alternative fuels for the Green Car Congress website. A car that doesn’t need to carry tanks of flammable, volatile liquid or compressed gas would be much less vulnerable in an accident. “It also potentially offsets the requirements for building up a massive hydrogen production and distribution infrastructure,” Millikin says - End quote Mike Millikin.

Quote- Hydrogen-on-demand, whether from water or another source, could address two of the big problems still holding back the wider use of hydrogen as a vehicle fuel: how to store the flammable gas, and how to transport it safely. Today’s hydrogen-fuelled cars rely on stocks of gas produced in centralized plants and distributed via refueling stations in either liquefied or compressed form. Neither is ideal. The liquefaction process eats up to 40 per cent of the energy content of the stored hydrogen; while the energy density of the gas, even when compressed, is so low it is hard to see how it can ever be used to fuel a normal car.-End quote new scientist magazine.

This also shows that water can be used as a fuel. The public need not to be fooled into thinking that a hydrogen economy needs to be assimilated by the usage of the now redundant production of dangerous hydrogen storage in tanks, and or produced by none renewable methods. Add to this suppressive fallacy; there have since surfaced HIGHER efficient ways of producing hydroxy technology since 1918.